Thursday, July 23, 2015

The IMF- What Is It? Why Native Filipinos Should Oppose It..... The Current Greek Financial Crisis (2015)

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) - What Is It? Why Native Filipinos Should Oppose It (Updated 6/10/2013 & 7/21/2015)

"The chief business of America is business" - President Calvin Coolidge, 1925

"What else do bankers do -- walk-in and turn-off the lights in the country." - William Slee, 1978

NOTES TO READERS:  Colored and/or underlined words are HTML links. Click on them to see the linked posts/articles. Forwarding this and other posts to relatives and friends, especially those in the homeland, is greatly appreciated. To share, use all social media tools: email, blog, Google+, Tumblr,Twitter,Facebook, etc. THANKS!!
Click the following underlined title/link to checkout these Essential/Primary Readings About Us Filipino Natives:
UPDATE 7/21/2015

The Greek financial crisis has been in the headlines in recent months/weeks. I was initially impressed by the young Prime MInister AlexisTsipras, but apparently he sold out at the end.
I sort of expected it on the day his Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis resigned, which I suspected was forced on the PM by the EU Group. Based on an interview of the Finance Minister, it appears the PM has less breadth and depth of conviction than him; Yanis and 49 other members of their SYRIZA party voted against the acceptance of the new (3rd) "austerity" programs as condition to approval of loans.
The Greek crisis is not the first of a kind, several countires in Latin America like Mexico, Peru, Argentina, etc. have been through such. It was only Argentina which stood its ground.
Anyway, if the Greek finanical crisis piqued your interest, I have updated and reposting here my 2005 post about the IMF, the gatekeeper of and enforcer for the creditor countries. The USA has the controlling votes in the IMF, with its 18-20% shares.
Re Greek ex-Finance Minister (2/13/2015 & 7/13/2015):…/yanis-varoufakis-full-transcr…
Paul Krugman NYTimes (Throwback 6/13/2012) GREECE AS VICTIM…/opi…/krugman-greece-as-victim.html…


Hi All,

Our homeland with its rich natural resources gives us no reason to be a people in dire poverty. But due to perennial misrule allowed by the complacency, selfishness and indifference by our so-called leadership and so-called educated among us: mainly middle and high-income class (Socioeconomic Classes A-B-C) we are. 

Meanwhile, extreme impoverishment has crept on the majority (socioeconomic classes D-E) of our fellow native Filipinos in the last 33 years as precipitated by the Marcos Dictatorship.

Though the first significantly large foreign borrowing began during the time of President Diosdado Macapagal, his successor Ferdinand Marcos precipitated the great national economic slide by incurring humongous foreign debts, some of which turned out to be odious debtsthrough the IMF-WB tandem. 

The foreign debt addiction continues under subsequent and subservient regimes (Cora Aquino, Fidel Ramos, Joseph Estrada, Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and expectedly the next regimes -- all  of whom come from the top socioeconomic class with their insatiable selfish, vested interests for more economic and political power, in partnership with foreign interests while keeping the native Filipino majority ignorant, entertained by trash pop culture media and suppressed with military and extrajudicial threats.

These foreign debts, which any informed and thinking Filipino knows, have burned as much as 70% of our yearly national budget as foreign debt installment payments (or 90% of annual revenues nowadays, as De Venicia claims).

De Venicia wants to fix our foreign debts by giving/surrendering away our national assets to these financial institutions and/or their consortium of creditors rather than asking for a moratorium of debt payments, defaulting, etc. 

How to deal with debts bravely and decisively is not in the table of our so-called leaders who have no balls, so to speak. Given the ignorance of the native majority, who are busy with mere,daily survival and thus without time; and consequent incapacity to understand what really is going on.

Below is an introduction to the IMF which together with the World Bank (WB) and the latter's supposedly good mission of poverty reduction, both instead turned intoeconomic inquisitors and executioners of poor countries like ours. 

IMF/WB methodologies and ways to further screw a poor country/people, further continue to pressure a bankrupt, un-nationalistic native rulers and citizenry to be "more efficient,"  include recommendations to:

  • reduction in public expenditures, particularly social services, i.e. public health, education, etc.;
  • improve and raise tax collection, (Value-Added tax VAT was started under Gloria Macapagal Arroyo);
  • increase exports, etc. (agribusiness, labor,etc).
  • influence our educational system (designed to direct/make us absolutely adhere to the doctrine of economic liberalism (neoliberalism)-- an economic system that has not worked in the long-run betterment of the native Filipino majority since our American colonization);
  • privatization of public companies;
  • strict control of organized labor;
  • deregulation of the national economy; 
  • decontrol of global financial flows.

All these to perpetuate the acceptance of  Neoliberalism and Global Order,the economic system and its "new" world order -- now euphemistically labeled as "globalism or globalization" -- which makes our homeland and the majority of our fellow native, Malay Filipinos what we are today: impoverished, ignorant, and thus desperate cowards.

- Bert 

UPDATES (6/10/2013 & 7/21/2015): 

ADDENDUM: The millstone on the necks of present and future generations of native (Malay) Filipino majority in the Philippines. With government’s -domestic and foreign- outstanding debt at P5.32 trillion, it means that each Filipino owes P55,469, based on the latest population estimate of 96 million.(Phil Daily Inquirer, 4/20/2013)

Philippine External/Foreign Debt:

  1.  When Marcos came to the presidency after defeating Pres. Diosdado Macapagal in 1965, our foreign debt stood at $600 million; then it grew to $2 billion in 1972 and $26 billion by the time the USA helped him flee to Hawaii in 1986. With Post-Marcos successor regimes of Cora Aquino, Fidel Ramos, Joseph Estrada, Gloria Arroyo and now Noynoy Aquino, our foreign debt ballooned from $26 billion to $60.5 billion in 2010 and $ 60.3 billion - ending Y2012 BSP Statistical Data; and now at $71 B as of June 2015, BSP)
  2. Throughout these years to the present, the ruling regimes oftentimes do not pay beyond the required minimum payments on the loans. (Banks love installment payments, as anyone who have loans/credit cards know, as much continuous and maximum profits are made by the creditors -- especially more so from countries, which are afraid to default.
  3. Thanks to Cora Aquino, naive, weak and incompetent for the presidential office who-- rather than taking opportunity of worldwide popularity/sympathy and working for an economic breathing spell for the native Filipino majority (suffering from a series of peso devaluations, plant closures and unemployment, high prices, etc.) --instead decided to please the applauding foreign governments, i.e. USA, Japan, etc. and foreign institutions/banks by not asking them for payment moratorium/rescheduling; and promised uninterrupted loan payments. Worst, she passed into law the prioritizing of foreign debt payments among others; all these she did despite the advice of then NEDA Director-General Solita Collas-Monsod).
  4. Compared with the South Koreans who were devastated by the 1998 financial crisis and had to be bailed out by borrowing $50 billion from the IMF, the South Koreans completely paid off their IMF debt by August 2001, almost two years ahead of schedule!  As Yoon Dae-hee, a spokesman for the South Korean Ministry of Finance and Economy. "We've retaken our economic sovereignty," Yoon said."From now on, we no longer need prior consultations with the IMF in planning and executing our economic policies."
  5. The present PenoyAquino regime claims we have more foreign reserves than foreign debt, mainly due to OFW remittances at $21 billion (2012), else the Philippines would be in the red all these years). It's time we pay off the foreign debts in significant amount towards the loan principal and not just the accumulating interests and be done with IMF/WB dictates on our national economy. Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) totaled only $1.25 billion for 2012. -  BSP Statistical Data). 
  6. We also pay some of these foreign debts via "asset conversion," whereby our government are forced to "privatize" or surrender some public assets like public land or facility. It may be the case for some of our former military bases that are now converted and owned privately, e.g. Fort Bonifacio (The Fort), etc.
  7. With the minimal FDI inflow compared to OFW remittances each year, we should find it suspicious why our rulers and those who call themselves (economic) reformers, under the foreign-influenced and local resident Chinese-led coRRECT Movement who insist in dismantling the already watered-down nationalist provisions in our 1987 Philippine Constitution "to attract foreign investments " 
  8. We therefore should instead defy the IMF/WB/WTO and revert to a more truly nationalistic Filipino First Policy in our homeland which of course can be realized only by a more informed, nationalistic and thus united native citizenry - this latter being the objective task, though difficult even dangerous at times, of those amongst us who know and understand "what's going on."
  9. What Can We Do?
    We  can not expect the present and subsequent regimes as these are populated by mainly political dynasties, oligarchs and so-called technocrats. Bloody revolution or not, we need to educate ourselves and our fellow native Filipino majority about what's going on politically, economically, culturally, etc.  Because a true democracy can be realized, that is, change and work for the citizenry only when the latter are well-informed; so it can actively select leaders to peacefully and/or forcefully demand socioeconomic and political changes for the common good.

    - BERT

OFW Remittances BSP Statistics (2010 to 2015):

Philippine Foreign Debt BSP Statistics (2012 to 2015):  ttp://


What is the IMF?

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank (WB) were created in 1944 at a conference in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, and are now based in Washington, DC. The IMF was originally designed to promote international economic cooperation and provide its member countries with short term loans so they could trade with other countries (achieve balance of payments). 

Since the debt crisis of the 1980's, the IMF has assumed the role of bailing out countries during financial crises (caused in large part by currency speculation in the global casino economy) with emergency loan packages tied to certain conditions, often referred to as "structural adjustment policies (SAPs)." 

The IMF now acts like a global loan shark, exerting enormous leverage over the economies of more than 60 countries. These countries have to follow the IMF's policies to get loans, international assistance, and even debt relief. Thus, the IMF decides how much debtor countries can spend on education, health care, and environmental protection

The IMF is one of the most powerful institutions on Earth -- yet few know how it works. 

1. The IMF has created an immoral system of modern day colonialism that SAPs the poor

The IMF -- along with the World Trade Organization (WTO) and the World Bank
 -- has put the global economy on a path of greater inequality and environmental destruction. The IMF's and World Bank's SAPs ensure debt repayment byrequiring countries to:

  • cut spending on education and health; 
  • eliminate basic food and transportation subsidies;
  • devalue national currencies to make exports cheaper; 
  • privatize national assets; and
  • freeze wages. 

Such belt-tightening measures increase poverty, reduce countries' ability to develop strong domestic economies and allow multinational corporations to exploit workers and the environment.

A recent IMF loan package for Argentina, for example, is tied to cuts in doctors' and teachers' salaries and decreases in social security payments.. The IMF has made elites from the Global South (poor/underdeveloped countries) more accountable to First World (developed/rich) elites than their own people, thus undermining the democratic process.

2. The IMF serves wealthy countries and Wall Street

Unlike a democratic system in which each member country would have an equal vote,rich countries dominate decision-making in the IMF because voting power is determined by the amount of money that each country pays into the IMF's quota system. It's a system of one dollar, one vote. 

The U.S. is the largest IMF shareholder with a quota of 18 percent. Germany, Japan, France, Great Britain, and the US combined control about 38 percent. The disproportionate amount of power held by wealthy countries means that the interests of bankers, investors and corporations from industrialized countries are put above the needs of the world's poor majority.

3. The IMF is imposing a fundamentally flawed development model

Unlike the path historically followed by the industrialized countries, the IMF forces countries from the Global South to prioritize export production over the development of diversified domestic economies. 

Nearly 80 percent of all malnourished children in the developing world live in countries where farmers have been forced to shift from food production for local consumption to the production of export crops destined for wealthy countries.

The IMF also requires countries to eliminate assistance to domestic industrieswhile providing benefits for multinational corporations -- such as forcibly lowering labor costs. Small businesses and farmers can't compete. 

Sweatshop workers in free trade zones set up by the IMF and World Bank earn starvation wages, live in deplorable conditions, and are unable to provide for their families. The cycle of poverty is perpetuated, not eliminated, as governments' debt to the IMF grows.

4. The IMF is a secretive institution with no accountability

The IMF is funded with taxpayer money, yet it operates behind a veil of secrecy. Members of affected communities do not participate in designing loan packages. The IMF works with a select group of central bankers and finance ministers to make polices without input from other government agencies such as health, education and environment departments. The institution has resisted calls for public scrutiny and independent evaluation.

5. IMF policies promote corporate welfare

To increase exports, countries are encouraged to give tax breaks and subsidies to export industries

Public assets such as forestland and government utilities (phone, water and electricity companies) are sold off to foreign investors at rock bottom prices. 

In Guyana, an Asian owned timber company called Barama received a logging concession that was 1.5 times the total amount of land all the indigenous communities were granted. Barama also received a five-year tax holiday. 

The IMF forced Haiti to open its market to imported, highly subsidized US rice at the same time it prohibited Haiti from subsidizing its own farmers. A US corporation called Early Rice now sells nearly 50 percent of the rice consumed in Haiti.

6. The IMF hurts workers

The IMF and World Bank frequently advise countries to attract foreign investors by weakening their labor laws -- eliminating collective bargaining laws and suppressing wages, for example. The IMF's mantra of "labor flexibility" permits corporations to fire at whim and move where wages are cheapest. 

According to the 1995 UN Trade and Development Report, employers are using this extra "flexibility" in labor laws to shed workers rather than create jobs. In Haiti, the government was told to eliminate a statute in their labor code that mandated increases in the minimum wage when inflation exceeded 10 percent. By the end of 1997, Haiti's minimum wage was only $2.40 a day.

Workers in the U.S. are also hurt by IMF policies because they have to compete with cheap, exploited labor. The IMF's mismanagement of the Asian financial crisis plunged South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand and other countries into deep depression that created 200 million "newly poor." 

The IMF advised countries to "export their way out of the crisis." Consequently, more than US 12,000 steelworkers were laid off when Asian steel was dumped in the US.

7. The IMF's policies hurt women the most

SAPs make it much more difficult for women to meet their families' basic needs. When education costs rise due to IMF-imposed fees for the use of public services (so-called "user fees") girls are the first to be withdrawn from schools. User fees at public clinics and hospitals make healthcare unaffordable to those who need it most. 

The shift to export agriculture also makes it harder for women to feed their families. Women have become more exploited as government workplace regulations are rolled back and sweatshops abuses increase.

8. IMF Policies hurt the environment

IMF loans and bailout packages are paving the way for natural resource exploitationon a staggering scale. The IMF does not consider the environmental impacts of lending policies, and environmental ministries and groups are not included in policy making. 

The focus on export growth to earn hard currency to pay back loans has led to an unsustainable liquidation of natural resources. For example, the Ivory Coast's increased reliance on cocoa exports has led to a loss of two-thirds of the country's forests.

9. The IMF bails out rich bankers, creating a moral hazard and greater instability in the global economy

The IMF routinely pushes countries to deregulate financial systems. The removal of regulations that might limit speculation has greatly increased capital investment in developing country financial markets. More than $1.5 trillion crosses borders every day. 

Most of this capital is invested short-term, putting countries at the whim of financial speculators. The Mexican 1995 peso crisis was partly a result of these IMF policies.

When the bubble popped, the IMF and US government stepped in to prop up interest and exchange rates, using taxpayer money to bail out Wall Street bankers. Such bailouts encourage investors to continue making risky, speculative bets, thereby increasing the instability of national economies. 

During the bailout of Asian countries, the IMF required governments to assume the bad debts of private banks, thus making the public pay the costs and draining yet more resources away from social programs.

10. IMF bailouts deepen, rather then solve, economic crisis

During financial crises -- such as with Mexico in 1995 and South Korea, Indonesia, Thailand, Brazil, and Russia in 1997 -- the IMF stepped in as the lender of last resort. Yet the IMF bailouts in the Asian financial crisis did not stop the financial panic -- rather, the crisis deepened and spread to more countries. 

The policies imposed as conditions of these loans were bad medicine, causing layoffs in the short run and undermining development in the long run. 

In South Korea, the IMF sparked a recession by raising interest rates, which led to more bankruptcies and unemployment. Under the IMF imposed economic reforms after the peso bailout in 1995, the number of Mexicans living in extreme poverty increased more than 50 percent and the national average minimum wage fell 20 percent.


"The ruling elites know who their enemies are, and their enemies are the people, the people at home and the people abroad. Their enemies are anybody who wants more social justice, anybody who wants to use the surplus value of society for social needs rather than for individual class greed, that's their enemy." – Michael Parenti 

"You show me a capitalist, I'll show you a bloodsucker" - Malcolm X, 1965

"Capitalism and altruism are incompatible; they are philosophical opposites; they cannot coexist in the same man or in the same society" - Ayn Rand, 1961

"The glory of the United States is business" - Wendell L. Willkie, 1936


PLEASE DONATE CORE SUBJECT BOOKS TO OUR HOMELAND (i.e. your hometown public schools, Alma Mater, etc.). Those books that you and/or your children do not need or want; or buy books from your local library during its cheap Book Sales. Also, cargo/door-to-door shipment is best.  It is a small sacrifice.  [clean up your closets or garage - donate books. THANKS!]

    "Those who profess to favor freedom
    and yet deprecate agitation

    are men who want crops without 
    plowing up the ground;
    they want rain without thunder and
    They want the ocean without the
    awful roar of its waters.
    This struggle may be a moral one
    or it may be a physical one

    or it may be both moral and physical
    but it must be a struggle.
    Power concedes nothing without a
    It never did, and never will." – Frederick Douglass
     American AbolitionistLecturerAuthor and Slave1817-1895

    "The question is not how to get good people to rule; the question is how to stop the powerful from doing as much damage as they can to us." – Sir Karl Popper, (28 July 1902 – 17 September 1994) Austro-British[4] philosopher and professor at the London School of Economics.[5] 

Tuesday, June 02, 2015

CAINGAT CAYO!! ...Noli Me Tangere and the Catholic Church in Our History (REVISED 6/2/2015)

Noli Me Tangere and the Catholic Church in Our History
[Subtitle: Sa manga masasamang libro,t, casulatan]

NOTES TO READERS:  Colored and/or underlined words are HTML links. Click on them to see the linked posts/articles. Forwarding this and other posts to relatives and friends, especially those in the homeland, is greatly appreciated. To share, use all social media tools: email, blog, Google+, Tumblr,Twitter,Facebook, etc. THANKS!!
Click the following underlined title/link to checkout these Essential/Primary Readings About Us Filipino Natives:
“Religion is excellent stuff for keeping common people quiet.”- Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821)

“Most people would rather die than think, in fact, they do so”. – Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)

Hi All,

After the novel Noli Me Tangere, written by Dr. Jose P. Rizal, was published in 1887, the below article CAINGAT CAYO was issued as a warning to Filipinos by a Spanish Catholic priest about God's damnation that will befall them for reading the novel.

I remember it was during my teens and only after leaving the seminary that I became aware, bought and read Rizal's two novels: Noli Me Tangere and its sequel, El Filibusterismo (translation by Leon Ma. Guerrero). At the time, I read them voraciously, with feelings of anxiety, shock and wonder.

It can safely be said that past, present and future generations of us native Malay Filipinos were/are/will be conditioned in an atmosphere of fear of God (and of the church, i.e. hierarchy) and being recruited by Satan/Devil to hell of eternal damnation. Such fears have created in us a habit of mind, of conscious and/or unconscious self-censorship in our thoughts, way of thinking and action.

Like a herd of sheeps we look and wait for our so-called God's shepherds to tell us what to think, question and do; or what not to think, question or do. We learn to live and practice the admonition "let us not go there" when we talk about certain important issues, i.e. Christian religion/belief systems.

We do not seem to realize that till today, our Filipino Christianity is still mainly that of the medieval outlook/version as compared to those of many other considered Christian countries (though simultaneously strongly secularized). Given that some native Filipino priests are trained in still conservative Spanish theological schools/universities, I suspect not much progressive changes can be expected in such outlook.

Our Filipino version of Christianity has worked:

- as an escape from reality, which makes Karl Marx's 165 plus-years old charge that religion is the opium of the people as valid and true;

- as a source of the conservative point-of-view, reactionary at worst; which has greatly contributed against the development of critical thinking (about our universe, about the establishment -our socioeconomic-political systems and institutions, etc.) among us native Filipinos;

-and consequently served as a primary impediment to the requisite fundamental changes in ourselves as individuals and our homeland/society, i.e.internal and external obstacles to progress/common good.

Let us recognize and be reminded that, generally speaking, religion produces three tendencies: conservative, reactionary and progressive.

It seems conservatives draw strength and comfort from the faith of their parents, as most native Filipinos (or for that matter many the world over do whatever their institutionalized religion, i.e. Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Jewish, etc.).  The danger of conservatism is that it tends to defend the status quo. Under pressure the conservative can become reactionary.

As we have witnessed, reactionaries and fundamentalists claim The Truth based on (their) scripture; convinced they possess the one true religion and advocate to enforce (their) supposed divinely revealed laws, i.e. Islamic order, Christian republic, Jewish state.

Progressives cherish their traditions, narratives, myths and doctrines but do not take them literally.  Thus they tend to be respectful of other traditions and  more open to interfaith dialogue. They promote historical and critical approaches to scripture to locate the essence of religion -as a powerful source of either despair or hope-  in our individual spiritual quest (not same as religious) and in our struggle for social justice.


Addendum: - I did not attempt to change the original(old style) Tagalog writing of the time. 
- History not taught us (our teachers did not know either or our Catholic schools did not allow) :
SPANISH FRIAR WARNED THE NATIVE FILIPINO AGAINST READING "NOLI ME TANGERE" via 'CAINGAT CAYO!!" (An expression of monkish hatred of Jose Rizal by Augustinian Fr. Jose Rodriguez,1888.)
[NOTE: On August 3 of the same year, Marcelo H. Del Pilar writing under the name "Dolores Manapat" wrote a pamphlet in answer to Fr. Rodriguez's work which he entitled "KAIIGAT KAYO" (Be slippery as an eel).
It could be said that the malicious work of Fr. Rodriguez became the spark that ignited and destroyed the power of Spain over the Philippines.
- Transcribed by J.C. Balmaseda-J.C.B./Project Gutenberg]

[Paalala ng nagsalin: Ang sumusunod na pasimula ng taga pag-ingat ng libro ay isinasama sa edisyong ito bagaman hindi kasama sa orihinal na pagkakalimbag.
"Ang polyetong ito'y ipinangalat nang walang bayad halos noong taong 1888 bilang paghamak kay Dr. Rizal at sa mga akda nito. Ang may katha ay isang paring kastila sa pangkat ng mga agustino.
Noong ika-3 ng Agosto ng taon ding yaon, ang polyetong ito ay tinugon ni Marcelo H. del Pilar sa isang polyeto ring pinamagatan namang "KAIIGAT KAYO" na may lagdang "Dolores Manapat".
Masasabing ang 'kalikutang' ito ni Fr. Rodriguez ay siyang naging titis na nagsiklab at siyang pumugnaw sa Kapangyarihan ng Espanya sa Pilipinas.
J.C. Balmaseda-J.C.B."/Project Gutenberg
"Upang maitindig natin ang bantayog ng ating lipunan, kailangang radikal nating baguhin hindi lamang ang ating mga institusyon kundi maging ang ating pag-iisip at pamumuhay. Kailangan ang rebolusyon, hindi lamang sa panlabas, kundi lalo na sa panloob!" --Apolinario Mabini, La Revolucion Filipina (1898)

Sa mañga masasamang libro,t, casulatan.
May lubos na pahintulot ang mañga Puno

Ang librong ito,i malilimus sa halagang isang cuarta ang isa; sa halagang sangsalapi ang sangdaan, at sa halagang apat na piso ang sanglibo, doon sa Asilo de Huérfanos sa Guadalupe, sa bayan nang san Pedro Macati, provincia nang Mainila.

Ang sulat na hingi ay ipadala sa P. Director cun sa Hermano Inspector nang Asilo, at bahala sila magpadala sa ituturong padadalhan sa Mainila.

Pequeña Imp. del Asilo del Huérfanos 1888.
Caiñgat ñga cayo sa manga masasamang libro,t, casulatan, sapagca,t, dapat ninyong tantoin na may isang cautusan ang santa Iglesiang Ina natin na ipinagbabaual ang pagbasa nang manga masasamang libro,t, casulatan, pati nang pag-iingat at pagcacalat noon; at ipinag-uutos pa na ang sino mang magcamayroon nang gayong libro,i, ibigay agad sa manga Puno nang santa Iglesia, sa Confesor cun sa Amang Cura caya; at cun sacali,t, di maibibigay ay sunuguin man lamang tambing. At ang utos na ito,i, mahigpit na di sapala, na cun di ninyo ganapin ay icapagcacasala ninyo nang casalanang daquila, at cun magcaminsa,i, maguiguing excomulgado pa cayo dahil sa pagbasa noon. Caya cun cusain ninyong basahin ang isang librong natatalastas ninyong baual nang santa Iglesia ay magcacamit cayo nang casalanang daquila, at cun sa saui ninyong palad ay abutin cayo nang camatayan sa gayong calagayang ay mapapacasama cayong magpasaualang hangan.

Ang manga Puno nang santa Iglesia, sa macatouid, ang santo Papa at ang manga Poong Cardenal na pinatungculan niya, sampon nang mang̃a Guinoong Obispo, ay mayroon silang capangyarihan macapagbabaual nang balang mamasam-in nilanglibrong icasasama nang mang̃a calolouang quinacaling̃a nila; at caya ng̃acatungculan naman nang baua,t, sino mang cristianong sundi,t, ganaping lubos ang canilang mang̃a utos tungcol dito. Ang balang minamasama,t, ibinabaual nila,i, tinatandaan nama,t, isinasacay sa isang librong pinacalistahan nang mang̃a librong baual at masasama.

Ng̃uni,t, palibhasa,i, hindi mangyayaring mabalitaan nila,t, maquita ang lahat na mang̃a masasamang librong ipinagcacalat sa sangcacristianohan; na caya,t, di naman mangyayaring matang̃ing maipagbaual na lahat; at sa cabila nama,i, cun itulot na basahin hangan di tang̃ing ipagbaual ang mang̃a gayong libro,i, macasasamang lubha sa mang̃a caloloua; dahil dito,i, ang santa Iglesia, ang mang̃a nasabing Puno baga nang santa Iglesia, upang mahadlang̃an hangan macacayanan din lamang, ang gayong mang̃a calaguim-laguim na capahamacan, ay mayroong ibinigay sa atin nang mang̃a utos na paraang pagcacaquilanlan nang mang̃a libro, na, cun di pa tang̃ing ipinagbaual, ay dapat nating parahing baual; at cun sacali,t, basahin ay ipagcacasala natin nang casalanang daquila, na para rin cun basahin ang tang̃i nang ipinagbaual. Isusunod co ng̃ang sasaysayin dito ang mang̃a pang̃ulong utos na paraang aquing sinabi, at nang mapagquilala mo, guiniguilio cong bumabasa nito, ang dapat mong asalin tungcol dito sa lubhang mahalagang bagay na icaliligtas nang caloloua mo sa capahamacang ualang hangan.

Ang caunaunaha,i, baual ang lahat na mang̃a libro sa Santong Casulatan na inihulog nang mang̃a ereje sa uicang castila, cun sa uicang tagalog, cun sa alin mang uica; cun sacali,t, cristiano man ang maghulog ay cun ualang pahintulot ang mang̃a Puno.—Caya ng̃a ang lahat na mang̃a libritong hang̃o sa santong Sulat sa bagong Testamento, na ipinagcacalat na limbag sa Oxfort at sa Hong-kong sa uicang castila at cung magcabihira,i, sa tagalog, ay pauang baual; sampon niyang mang̃a Evangeliong uicang castila cun tagalog caya, na iniing̃atan nang marami, cun isinasabit sa liig na parang anting-anting, ay baual din naman.

Ang icalaua,i, baual din ang mang̃a librong sadyang nagtutucoy, nagsasalita, cunnagtuturo caya nang calibugan, cahit doo,i, ualang nahahalong maling aral cun erejía caya.—Alinsunod dito,i, baual iyang lahat na mang̃a palasintaha,t, auit at corridong paraparang mahahalay, na totoong quinauiuilihang basahing nang caramihang mang̃a tagalog, lalaqui man at babayi man. ¡Daming ba pa nang mang̃a nang̃apapang̃anyayang caloloua dahil dito sa mang̃a tampalasang auit at palasintahan! Cun touirin ninyong mabuti ay agad matatalastas na ang pagcapang̃anyaya nang di mabilang na mang̃a bagong-tauo,t, dalaga,i, nagmula sa pagbasa nitong mang̃a baual na auit at palasintahan.

Ang icatlo,i, baual naman ang mang̃a devociones cun tauaguin, ang mang̃a panalang̃in, at mang̃a casulatang quinapapalamnan nang mang̃a pang̃acong sinung̃aling, na di umano,i, ang mang̃a gayo,t, gayon ay ualang di pangyayari.—Caya ng̃a,t, alinsunod dito,i, iyang mang̃a panalang̃in, at iyang mang̃a casulatan na di umano,i, nalaglag sa Lang̃it, at nasumpung̃ang nacababao sa santo Sepulcro, sa altar cayang pinagmimisahan nang santo Papa, at iba,t, iba pang ganito na ipinalimbag sa mang̃a panahong ito sa uicang castila ma,t, sa uicang tagalog, at ipinagcacalat na mainam nang mang̃a alagad nang demonio, ay pauang baual, at ipagcacasala nang sino man ang pagdarasal at ang pagbasa noon, pati nang pagcacalat at pagiing̃at niyon.

Ang icapat ay baual din naman ang lahat na mang̃a libro, mang̃a munting fojas, at munti man mang̃a casulatang nagtuturo nang panghuhula, panggagayuma, pangculam, at iba,t, iba pa.—Ayon dito,i, ipinagcacasala ang pagbasa,t, pag-iing̃at ang mang̃a lunario, cun tauaguin nang iba; at iyang lahat na mang̃a casulatang iniing̃atan nang mang̃a hang̃al na ualang namumuang̃an; na marahil cun caya iniing̃ata,t, pinaniniualaan ay di umano,i, sulat yaon nang mang̃a matatanda, na mang̃a hang̃al pa sa canila.

Ang icalima,i, baual na lahat ang mang̃a libro na hangan sa taon 1584 at hangan ng̃ayo,i, nilimbag ó lilimbaguing ualang itinuturong pang̃alan nang sumulat ó cumatha, nang nagpalimbag, nang pinaglilimbagan, pati nang panahong ipinagpalimbag; at cun sacali ma,t, may itinuro ang lahat nang ito,i, mang̃a hindi totoo ang itinuturo, at paconouari lamang;sapagca,t, ito,i, nagpapaquilalang dapat pang̃anibang may taglay na lico,t masasamang aral na di dapat basahin nang isang cristiano.—Alinsunod dito,i, ang lahat na mang̃a auit at corrido, na arao-arao,i, ipinalilimbag na ualang pahintulot, at ualang itinuturong may catha, (na palibhasa,i, iquinahihiya ang sinulat ay di ibig na maquilala) ay paraparang baual na lahat; lalong lalo na,t, ang caramihan niyang mang̃a auit ay mang̃a punong puno nang mang̃a camaliang di naayon sa mang̃a aral nang santa Iglesia.

Gayon din naman iyang mang̃a libro,t casulatang ipinagcacalat ng̃ayon sa uicang castila at sa uicang tagalog na aula ring itinuturong may gaua,t, may palimbag; at ang laman niyon ay pauang cabulaanang laban sa señor Arzobispo at sa mang̃a Pareng religioso, na pati nang mang̃a cagalang-galang na mang̃a Madre religiosa, ay di rin quinaalang-alang̃anan nang tampalasan nilang pluma, ay ang lahat na ganiyang mang̃a libro,t, casulatan ay baual na basahin, at ipagcacasala nang daquila ang pagbasa,t, pag-iing̃at noon, at lalong lalo na ang pagcacalat.

Pauang cabulaanan, uica co; sapagca,t, cun mapatotohanan nila sana ang canilang mang̃a sinasabi ay hindi nilang ipagmamacahiyang maalaman ang canilang mang̃a pang̃alan; at cun totoo sana ang laman niyang mang̃a carimarimaring sulat ay ualang sucat icatacot ang may catha man, ang lumimbag man, ó ang nagpapalimbag, at nagpapacalat caya, cahit sila,i, ipaghabla,t, isacdal sa Justicia nang mang̃a pinararatang̃an nila nang gayong mang̃a casamaan. Tunay ng̃a pala na ang mang̃a nagcacalat nang mang̃a gayong sulat na anónimo (ualang pang̃alan) ay sucat ipaquibilang sila sa mang̃a tauong ualang hiya!

Ang icaanim ay baual ang lahat na mang̃a librong sulatin cun ipang̃alat, na ang taglay na laman ay mang̃a maling caisipa,t, mang̃a aral na laban sa pinasasampalatayanan sa atin nang santa Iglesia.—Gaya nang̃a baga nang librong catha nang Dr. Rizal, na ang pang̃ala,i, Noli me tangere, na pinupuri,t, binabasang ualang agam-agam nang maraming natuturang cristiano, baga ma,t, sa pagbasang ito,i, nagcacamit sila nang casalanang daquila; sapagca,t, ang nasabing libro,i, punong puno nang mang̃a erejía,t, mang̃a aral na laban sa ating santa Religión.

Halos sa baua,t, fojas at sa baua,t, talata ay may mababasa roong mang̃a sabing sinung̃aling, mang̃a udyoc na capangahasan, mang̃a nacamumuhi,t, mahalay na iparing̃ig sa mang̃a tunay na cristiano, mang̃a paglalapastang̃an sa mang̃a cagalang-galang na Puno nang santa Iglesia at sa caramihang cristiano, mang̃a pagsisiphayo sa Dios, mang̃a camangmang̃a,t, cahunghang̃ang humihicayat sa pagcampi sa tacsil at sucab na si Lutero at sa iba pang mang̃a ereje, mang̃a aral na lubhang lihis at mang̃a erejíang tunay; ano pa,t, hangan sa umuudyoc upang houag sampalatayanang may Dios. Ang lahat nang ito,i, pauang mababasa diyan sa tampalasang libro, at caya baual na basahin, at ang pagbasa noo,i, isang lubhang mabigat na casalanan. At ang may catha noon, ang Dr. Rizal baga, cun taimtim sa caniyang loob ang mang̃a sinulat niya sa nasabing libro at hindi pa niya pinagsisisiha,t, tinatalicdan, ay dapat na ariin siyang tacsil at tampalasan sa Dios, ereje at excomulgado.

Tingni, mang̃a guiniguilio cong tagalog, tingni,t, masdan itong caauaaua capoua ninyong tagalog, na pinupuri nang marami sa inyo na parang ualang capara sa carunung̃an; ualang dao ga sino si Rizal; di umano,i, capurihan dao nang lahi ninyong tagalog, na sucat ninyong ipagparang̃alan. ¡Ay sa aba co! At lalong catampatang sabihin, na sucat inyong ipagmamacahiya ang gayong cahabag-habag na bulag na loob; sapagca,t, siyang caunaunahang tagalog na cusang gumamit nang caniyang camay sa pagsulat nang mang̃a catacot-tacot na catampalasanan sa Dios, sa ating santa Religión cristiana, at sa mang̃a sinasampalatayanan natin.

Bucod pa sa siya,i, tampalasan, ay hañgal pa naman sa madlang bagay; sapagca,t, cun siyasatin ang pagcagaua nang nasabing libro,i, isip ninyong hindi ang camay nang may bait na tauo, cundi ang paa nang isang mangmang ang isinulat noon; at halos sa lahat nang fojas ay mapagmahal na ang gumaua,i, hang̃al na hang̃al sa paghahanay nang masanghayang pananalita, lalong lalo na sa uicang castila; ang totoong tang̃ing matatanghal doon ang sino man ay ang isang sucab at tacsil na pagcapoot niya sa ating santa Religión at sa España.

Ang icapito,t, catapusa,i, baual ang lahat na mang̃a librong malaqui ma,t, maliliit, ang mang̃a munting calat na casulatan, ang mang̃a diario, at balang nang sulat na ang laman ay lumalaban sa mang̃a aral nang santa Iglesia; ang tanang casulatang nagpupuri sa mang̃a camaliang hinati,t, sinala nang santo Papa, gaya nang mang̃a sinala ni Pio IX sa caniyang casulatang padala sa sangcacristianohan, nang 8 de Diciembre de 1864; ang balang nang sulat na cumucut-ya sa mang̃a Santong guinagalang nating sa mang̃a altar, cun nagsasalita caya nang mang̃a cabulaana,t, ipinataratang sa canila nang mang̃a gaua, mang̃a uica,t, mang̃a acalang di ucol sa cabanalan; ang lahat nang mang̃a librong nanunuya sa mang̃a Sacramento,t, sa mang̃a ugaling paraang na ipinag-uutos nang santa Iglesia sa pagmimisa, pagdarasal, at sa iba,t, ibang mang̃a gauang magaling; at sa cauacasa,i, ang dilang casulatang sa conouari ma,t, di conouari ay cumacampi sa mang̃a camaliang aral na laban sa pananampalataya at sa mang̃a mabanal na asal.—Laban dito sa cautusang itong bigay nang santo Papang si Pio IX, upang masaula ang mang̃a cristiano sa pagbasa nangmg̃a masasamang diario, ay hindi lamang nagcasala ang mang̃a bumabasa nang balang na sa mang̃a nasabing casulatan, cundi pa naman ang nang̃acacatulong sa pagpalimbag at sa pagcacalat, gaya baga cun limbaguin, ipagbili, bilhin, pasulat at iba pa.

Ang pitong utos na ito,i hang̃ong lahat sa libro nang indice sa naturang casulatan ni Pio IX na dapat nating talimahi,t, ganapin, cun tunay nating ibig na mapacagaling.


Bucod pa sa rito,i, cun caya gayon ang ipinag-uutos nang santa Iglesia sapagca,t, ito,i, utos din naman nang Dios, na turo sa atin nang catutubo nating bait; na cahit di ipagbaual nang santa Iglesia, at mauala man ang listahan nang mang̃a librong baual na, at cahit di nagcaroon nang mang̃a utos na paraang pagcacaquilanlan nang mang̃a masasamang libro, ay nagtuturo sa atin ang catutubo nating bait na di dapat basahin ang mang̃a gayong librong masasama. At sa catunaya,i, magsabi ca sa aquin: ¿di caya baga mabigat na casalanang laban sa icalimang utos nang Dios ang cumain cun uminum caya nang lasong icatatapus nang sariling buhay, at icamamatay nang ating catauan? Ay ano ¿di caya baga lalong mabigat na casalanan ang cumain nang lasong icatatapus nang buhay nang atin caloloua, na icamamatay baga niya dahil sa pagcauala sa caniya nang pananampalataya?

Diyata,i, pinatotohanan co sa iyo na ualang mabisang lasong icamamatay nang ating catauan na sucat mapara sa lasong taglay nang masasamang libro; lasong sacdal nang bisa sa icasisira nang pananampalataya,t, icamamatay tuloy nang ating caloloua; lason ng̃ang camatay-matay na capag nahahalata nating nasisilid sa ano mang casulatan ay catungculan nating pang̃ilagan, at cun dili,i, magcacamit tayo nang mabigat na casalanan cun ituloy nating basahin. Caya ng̃a ualang maimatouid ang maraming bumabasa nang mang̃a librong limbag ma,t, sulat camay, gaya nang mang̃a cay Rizal, na ang itinututol nila,i, di pa ipinagbaual; sapagca,t, cun di pa tang̃ing ipinagbaual, ay baual na talaga, ayon sa mang̃a cautusang sinasaysay na; at bucod pa sa rito,i, capag naquiquitang may lason nang mang̃a erejía at mang̃a lisiyang aral ay ipinagbabaual nang catutubo nating bait, na nagpapaquilala sa ating yao,i, utos nang Dios. Sucat na lamang na sabihin sa iyo nang Confesor ó nang ibang mabait na Sacerdote, cun nang iba pa mang tauo na nacacaalam, at cahit icao man ang Páhiná 19macamasid na ang gayong libro,i, masama, at pagdaca,i, dapat mong bitiua,t, ibigay sa iyong Confesor cun sa iyong Amang Cura, at cun dili caya ipagatong mo sa apoy; sapagca,t, cun pabayaan mo muna sa bahay may pang̃anib na mabasa; at ang cusang lumalagay sa pang̃anib ay diyan siya mapapang̃anyaya, uica nang Dios Espíritu Santo.

Caya ng̃a, cristianong bumabasa nito, ay houag cang paraya sa iyong sarili, na gaya nang ibang marami na ang acala,i, hindi totoong nacacapahamac ang pagbasa nang mang̃a masasamang libro; sapagca,t, hindi masama lamang, cundi casamasamaan ang quinasasapitan nang sumusuay sa mang̃a utos na ito. ¡Ay capatid co! Sinong macapagsasalaysay nang mang̃a casiraang nangyayari sa mang̃a caloloua dahil sa pagbasa nang Páhiná 20mang̃a masasamang libro? Ang uica nang P. Doctor Sardá: «na ang isang masamang librong may taglay na mang̃a tacsil na udyoc, cun mang̃a mahahalay ang halimbaua ay higuit ang casamaan sa mapagcanulong caibigan, higuit ang cahunghang̃an sa mahunghang na maestro, at lalong dapat capootan sa magdaraya,t, mapaghibong tauo.

Ualang imic-imic, at di nang̃adaramdaman ay unti-unting binabagbag ang puso, inililigao ang lalong matalinong isip, sinisira ang lalong maayos na cabaitan, hinihila ang calooban sa mang̃a lisiyang asal, pinupucao ang mang̃a mahahalay na pita, pinapaniniig sa maruruming gaua at malibughaang casalanan». ¿Ano caya ang dahil na yaong binatang dating mabait at masunurin sa magulang ay ng̃ayo,i, naguíng mapagyabang at ualang cahihiyan? Cun ano,t, yaong dalagang dating masayang loob at mahinhing asal ay ng̃ayo,i, laguing namamanglao at caguitla-guitlang ugali? Cun sino ang nagnacao sa canila nang cabaitan, nang cahinhinan, nang casayahan nang loob, sampon nang casiglahan nang canilang catauan?

¡Ay sa aba co! Yaon palang tampalasang libro, yaong mahalay na auit, yaong carumal-dumal na palasintahan, yaong maruruming tula, na paraparang pinatutuloy sa bahay nang ualang pag-iing̃at na magulang! ¡Ay sa aba ninyo, mang̃a magulang! at cayo ng̃a ang hihing̃ang sulit nitong mang̃a casiraang iquinapapahamac nang di mabilang na mang̃a masasama na di ninyo pinalalayo sa inyong bahay at sa camay at mata nang inyong mang̃a anac! Sapagca,t, maniuala cayo,t, dili, ay uuliting cong sabihin ang sinabi co nang madalas: Ay nagcacasala nang daquilang casalanan ang sino mang cristiano, na baga ma,t, natatalastas niyang baual, ó dapat man lamang ipagbaual, ay bumabasa nang mang̃a tampalasang libro. At di lamang nagcacasala ang bumabasa nang mang̃a librong yaon, cundi pa naman ang nag-iing̃at, sapagca,t, utos nang santa Iglesia na ibigay sa mang̃a Puno, cun dili caya,i, sunuguin. At nagcacasala rin nang daquila ang magpahiram sa ibang ualang pahintulot sa pagbasa nang masasamang libro.


Alinsunod dito sa mang̃a sinabi co magpahang̃an ng̃ayo,i, marahil nasain mo, cristianong bumabasa, ang ilang malinao,t, tapat na hatol, na parang pinacareglang aalinsunurin; na cun sundin mo naman ay macapang̃ing̃ilag ca sampon nang iyong mang̃a casambahay, mang̃a caibigan nama,t, caquilala, sa mang̃a daquilang pang̃anib na laguing nasusumpung̃an sa pagbasa nang mang̃a masasamang libro. Isasaysay co ng̃a sa iyo ang mang̃a inaacala cong lalong quinacailang̃an at lalong bagay sa pagtatamo nang ninanasa nating paquinabang.

Una-una. Capag banta mong bumili cun bumasa nang anomang libro, munti ma,t, malaqui man, nang diariong may mang̃a lamina,t, uala, nang auit man, tula man, maguing limbag maguing sulat camay, ay bago mong bilhin ó basahin ay dapat mong usisain muna cun baual, cun dili caya; ó cun dapat maguing baual sapagca,t, masama.—Ang pag-uusisa nito,i, nacacailang̃ang siyasatin mo cun ang librong bibilhin ó babasahin ay natatamaan nang alin man sa mang̃a pitong utos na paraang pagcacaquilanlan nang mang̃a librong dapat na ipagbaual, na baual na talaga; at ang lalong maigui sa lahat ay magtanong ca sa Confesor, cun sa Cura caya, cun sa canino mang banal na sacerdote; at ang paraan na ito,i, lalong magaling, sapagca,t, malalayo ca sa pang̃anib nang pagcacamali.

Icalaua. Dapat mong tandaang pinacalandas di dapat sinsayan ang houag bumili, at houag bumasa nang ano mang libro, auit, at casulatang uala sa unang fojas na may lubos na pahintulot ang mañga PUNO. Sapagca,t, ang ayao huming̃i nang pahintulot sa mang̃a Puno ay marahil hindi cristiano, at cun ganoon sucat nang ipaquibilang sa mang̃a baual ang quinathang libro; at cun cristiano naman, at ayao huming̃i nang pahintulot ay hayag siyang souail na cristiano, at masasapantahang magtuturo nang camalian.

Tanto cong magaling na yaong ibang libro,i, di nagcacailang̃an nang pahintulot, at nang mailimbag; at mababasa ng̃a cahit uala ang gayong pahintulot; datapoua,t, sang-ano man ang pag-iing̃at tungcol dito,i, alang̃an pa; sapagca,t, sa casamaang nang mang̃a panahong quinalalag-yan natin ay pati sa mang̃a librong di nagcacailang̃an nang pahintulot, cun magcabihira,i, iguiniguiit din ang mang̃a erejía at mang̃a lisiyang aral: caya ng̃a cailang̃an din sumigao na ualang tugot: ¡Caing̃at cayo sa mang̃a masasamang libro,t, casulatan!

Napagunaua mo na marahil, na sa toui cong sinasabing cailang̃an ang pahintulot nang mang̃a Puno, ang tinutucoy cong mang̃a Puno ay ang sa santa Iglesia, ang Santo Papa baga at ang mang̃a Poong Obispo, palibhasa,i, sila na lamang ang macahahatol nang cagaling̃an at casamaan nang ano mang libro.

Icatlo. Cun totoong totoo,t, ninanasa mong houag magcamali dito sa daquilang bagay na ito, ang lalong mabisang paraan, na nasasaclauan nang lahat na mang̃a ibang paraang iyong mapipili, ay ito ng̃a: Na houag cang bumili, at houag bumasa nang ano mang libro, diario, auit at ano mang casulatan na di ca maquipagsanguni muna sa iyong Confesor, sa iyong Amang Cura, cun sa ibang banal na Sacerdote. At ito rin ang dapat mong ipasunod sa iyong mang̃a nasasacupan. Sapagca,t, doon pa sa mang̃a librong hindi masama, at may pahintulot ang mang̃a Puno sa paglimbag, ay marami rin ang di mo nararapat basahin, sapagca,t, marahil macasasama sa iyo; at caya ualang macapaghahatol sa iyo nang tapat gaya nang mang̃a may catungculang magsaquit sa icagagaling nang iyong caloloua.

Sundin mo ng̃a, guilio cong cristiano, itong mang̃a bilin co sa iyo, at ipasunod mo naman sa iyong mang̃a nasasacupan, at hindi ninyong icapapang̃anyaya ang mang̃a masasamang casulatan. At cun sacali,t, dala nang di ninyo carunung̃an nang dacong arao ay may pinatuloy cayo sa inyong bahay na mang̃a librong masasama ay inyong pagsicapang hanapin, ay dalhin ninyo agad sa Amang Cura cun sa Confesor, na ito ng̃a ang lalong magaling; ng̃uni,t, cun di ninyo magagaua ito,i, sunuguin ninyong tambing. Sunuguin, sunuguing ualang aua,t, hinayang sa salaping ibinili niyong mang̃a libro, at nang houag cayo,i, masunog sa infierno dahilan sa canila.

¡Ay capatid co! cun tularan mo sana ang magandang halimbauang ipinaquita niyaong isang babaying nang̃ang̃alacal nang libro, ayon sa sinasalita ni P. Mach sa caniyang librong «Tesoro del Catequista»:

Nang malapit nang mangyari yaong balitaa,t, malaquing pagcagulo doon sa caharian nang Francía, ay may isang babaying nang̃ang̃alacal nang libro na dinatnan nang balita, na si P. Borgar (Beauregard) ay lubhang mariquit na magsermon, na caya ng̃a hinahang̃aan siya nang lahat na taga Paris.

Dala nang balitang ito,i napasa simbahan nang Nuestra Señora de Paris ang nasabing babayi, at gayac siyang maquiquinyig nang pang̃ang̃aral nang Pareng yaon; at nagcataon naman na ang mang̃a sinasabi nang Pare noong gabing yaon ay pauang nauucol sa mang̃a masasamang libro. Ang naturang babayi, baga ma,t, timtima,t, may puri, ay nagbibili nang mang̃a librong laban sa ating santa Religión at laban din sa magagaling na asal. Anaqui nabulagan siya nang casaquiman sa salapi, gaya nang pagcabulag nang maraming naglalaco,t, nang̃ang̃alacal nang mang̃a mahahalay na palasintahan, auit, corrido at iba,t, iba pang mang̃a masasamang casulatan, at di nila inaanumana ang mang̃a casalanang di mabilang na quinacamtan nila, at ang mang̃a quinacamtan nang iba dahilan sa canila.

Ng̃uni,t, ang babaying yao,i, dahil sa pang̃ang̃aral nang Pare ay iminulat niya ang mata nang caniyang isip, caya,t, napagquilala, na ang mang̃a tampalasang librong lumalaban sa santa Religión, at umaaquit sa maruruming hilig nang catauan, ay parang bucal nang camatay-matay na lasong sumisira sa caloloua,t, puso nang tauo; at ang mang̃a nagpapalimbag, nagbibili, cun tumutulong sa papaano mang paraan nang pagcacalat sa mang̃a gayong libro ay catulad nang mang̃a manglalason; at darating ang arao, at sila,i, hihing̃an nang Pang̃inoong-Dios nang mahigpit na pagsusulit sa mang̃a caguluha,t, casalanang nangyari dahil sa canila.

Halos di ng̃a magcasiya sa loob nang babaying yaon ang sisi sa sarili, at napag-unaua na ang pang̃ang̃alacal niya,i, lubhang di carapat-dapat sa isang calolouang may iniing̃atan pang cahihiyan at pagquilala sa Dios; caya ng̃a,t, minabuti niyang lisanin magpacailan man ang paghahanap buhay na yaon. Nang matapus ang sermon ay tinung̃o niya ang bahay nang Pare, at nagsabi sa caniya nang ganito: Aquin napagquiquilala, Ama co, ang cadaquilaan nang aquing pagcacasala sa pagbibili co nang mang̃a masasamang libro; ng̃uni,t, yayang minulan na ninyo ang paggamot sa aquing caloloua,i, lubusin ninyong pagcagaling̃in: pumaroon po cayo sa aquing tindahan, tignan ninyo ang mang̃a librong naroroon, at sunuguin po ninyo ang lahat na mamasamain ninyo.

Sang-ano man ang maguing capang̃aluguihan co, at mauala man sa aquin ang lahat cong mang̃a tinubo, ay mamagaanin cong lahat, houag lamang mapacasama ang aquing caloloua. Pinuri ni P. Borgar ang gayong magandang banta, at nang̃acong tutulong̃an siya sa pagganap nang caniyang ninanasa. Quinabucasa,i, naparoon siya, ibinucod ang mang̃a masasamang libro,t, itinuro sa babayi, na quinuha nito,t, isinugbang lahat sa isang malaquing siga na caniyang inihanda. Ang halaga nang mang̃a sinunog na libro,i, mahiguit dao sa sanglibo,t, dalauang daang piso; at magmula noo,i, pinagtiticahan niyang mahigpit na hindi na magbibili nang mang̃a ibang libro, cundi yaon lamang macapagpapagaling sa mang̃a caloloua.

¡Tularan naua itong magandang halimbaua nang mang̃a sederang naglalaco nang mang̃a bagay bagay na auit at masasamang libro! Tularan mo rin ng̃a, guiniguilio cong bumabasa, cun sacali,t, sa mang̃a nacaraang arao,i, di ca nagpacaing̃at capara nitong babayi; at tungcol sa haharaping arao ay houag cang lumihis munti man sa mang̃a itinuro sa iyo dito sa libritong ito. At isinasamo co pa sa iyo na ipaquilala mo ang libritong ito sa iyong mang̃a hinlog, mang̃a catoto,t, mang̃a caquilala, at nang sila nama,i, gumanap nang mang̃a bilin dito: at cun magcaganoon ay mahahadlang̃an ang marami sa mang̃a capahamacang dala nang masasamang libro,t, casulatan.

¡Loobin naua nang catamis-tamisang Puso ni Jesús at nang calinis-linisang Puso ni Maria, sampon nang maloualhating Poon san José, na pagpalain nila,t, gauaran nang mahal nilang bendición itong munti cong pagod, upang mapaquinabang̃an nang mang̃a caloloua, at mapatungcol na lahat sa lalong capurihan nang Dios. Siya naua.

Fr. José Rodriguez
Religioso sa Orden ni san Agustin.

Source:,3+caingat+cayo+gutenberg&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us (THIS SOURCE NOT IN WEB ANYMORE, BUT I FOUND A NEW SOURCE LINK ON PROJECT GUTENBERG - Bert 6/2/2015: u

“Religion is the sigh of the oppressed people, the heart of the heartless world, and the soul of the soulless conditions, it is the opium of the people.” – Karl Marx

“Men never commit evil so fully and joyfully as when they do it for religious convictions.” – Blaise Pascal

“There is no literate population in the world that is poor; there is no illiterate population that is anything but poor.” – John Kenneth Galbraith (1908-2006)

“If knowledge can create problems, it is not through ignorance that we can solve them”. – Isaac Asimov, 1920-1992